Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
This section will focus exclusively on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) treatment for childhood-onset cerebral ALD.
Authors: Charles Peters, M.D. and Stephan Kemp, Ph.D.
Experience with HSCT for cerebral ALD and lessons learned
Successful use of HSCT dates to 1969. Following intensive chemotherapy with or without radiation, suitably matched (HLA typed) blood (i.e., hematopoietic) stem cells from bone marrow, peripheral blood or umbilical cord blood are infused intravenously. In the setting of an allogeneic transplant (i.e., from a related or unrelated donor rather than autologous), measures must be taken to minimize or eliminate a potentially fatal complication in which donor-derived immune cells attack cells and tissues of the recipient. This reaction is termed graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). In addition, sufficient suppression of the recipient’s immune system function must be achieved to reduce the likelihood that the recipient will be capable of rejecting the donor cells. Over a period of several weeks to months, donor blood stem cells, after homing to the bone marrow, engraft and produce sufficient blood cells to replenish the “ablated” host blood producing system. By this time, the recipient has usually become red blood cell and platelet transfusion-independent. However, recovery of the immune system, which is intended to be donor-derived, requires a prolonged period and during this time the recipient is at risk for developing a variety of potentially life-threatening “opportunistic” infections. Deaths, which occur after HSCT that are the result of transplant-related measures, are attributed to transplant-related mortality (TRM).
Over the past 4 decades, HSCT has been successfully used to treat a wide variety of disorders including leukemia, lymphoma, malignant solid tumors, aplastic anemia and bone marrow failure conditions, immune deficiency disorders, hemoglobinopathies such as sickle cell anemia and thalassemia, as well as genetic disorders such as lysosomal storage disorders and leukodystrophies.
In the case of genetic disorders, HSCT represents a form of “adoptive” gene therapy whereby cells from the donor are capable of producing the enzyme/protein that the recipient is genetically incapable of making. In the case of cerebral ALD, this mechanism and/or correction of the immune-mediated destruction of myelin may be the reason for its effectiveness. It should be noted that, in patients with leukemia, the development of GVHD may be associated with a graft-versus-leukemia effect thereby reducing the likelihood of leukemic relapse. In boys with cerebral ALD, there is no comparable therapeutic benefit, which can be derived from the development of GVHD after HSCT; instead, GVHD has been associated with further progression or worsening of cerebral disease. In addition, for there to be sustained benefit and protection from the HSCT, boys with cerebral ALD must continue to have a significant degree of donor-derived cells present.
It should be noted that gadolinium enhancement noted on brain MRI in boys with cerebral ALD is associated with “active” demyelination. Disappearance of this enhancement has been observed as early as 1 month following HSCT in the setting of donor-derived engraftment. However, the time required for a successful donor-derived HSCT to effectively halt the progression of cerebral ALD demyelination is measured in months, often 6 to 12.
Evaluations of boys with cerebral ALD undergoing HSCT usually include neurological examinations, neuropsychological testing which includes full scale intelligence quotient (FSIQ), verbal IQ (VIQ) and performance IQ (PIQ) as well as MRI of the brain with gadolinium contrast. These evaluations are essential to the assessment of the feasibility of HSCT and the likelihood that the recipient will benefit from it. A system of documenting neurologic deficits is routinely used. It has been noted that the performance IQ (PIQ) of neuropsychological testing is particularly sensitive to deficits in visual processing which are typically observed in boys with a posterior pattern of demyelination. Finally, a detailed demerit scoring (0-34 points) developed by Dr. Loes aids in determining the extent of myelin injury in brain (e.g., very early stage = MRI score 1-3; early stage = MRI score 4-8; late stage = MRI score 9-13; very late stage = MRI score greater than 13).
Historical overview of the experience with HSCT in the treatment of cerebral ALD
1982: First bone marrow transplant for childhood cerebral ALD performed in a boy with advanced (ie, very late) stage disease followed by death due to disease progression despite successful engraftment (Moser et al., 1984).
1990: Aubourg and colleagues in Paris described the first successful bone marrow transplant in a boy with very early stage cerebral disease (Aubourg et al., 1990).
2000: Long-term results (i.e., 5-10 years) of BMT in 12 boys. Shapiro and colleagues described the prospects for achieving stability in demyelination and changes in neuropsychologic function with a propensity for deterioration before ultimate stabilization in visual processing as reflected in the PIQ in boys with a posterior pattern of demyelination (Shapiro et al., 2000).
2004: The international HSCT experience from 1982-99 for childhood and adolescent cerebral ALD was compiled through a consortium of 43 HSCT centers (Peters et al., 2004). This was the first comprehensive report of the worldwide experience with HSCT for this disease and described 126 subjects of whom 94 were deemed to have complete data, which were suitable for detailed statistical analysis. The demographics and characteristics of the patients and their transplants are presented in Table 1 (adapted from Peters C et al Blood 2004).
|Table 1: Characteristics of 94 boys with cerebral ALD who underwent HSCT. Adapted from Peters et al. (2004).|
|Related donor, n=42||Unrelated donor, n=52||Total, n=94|
|Year of HSCT|
|1982-1995||29 (69%)||20 (38%)||49 (52%)|
|1996-1999||13 (31%)||32 (62%)||45 (48%)|
|Median age patient at HSCT|
|Years (range)||9 (5-16)||9 (5-19)||9 (5-19)|
|Reason for diagnosis|
|Family History||11 (26%)||17 (33%)||28 (30%)|
|ALD signs/symptoms||27 (64%)||31 (60%)||58 (62%)|
|Unknown||4 (10%)||4 (8%)||8 (9%)|
|Blood Stem Cells|
|bone marrow/umbilical cord blood||42 (100%)/0 (0%)||40 (77%)/12 (23%)||82 (87%)/12 (13%)|
|Chemo only||31 (74%)||17 (33%)||48 (51%)|
|Chemo + radiation||11 (26%)||35 (67%)||46 (49%)|
The ALD-disability rating scale (ALD-DRS) was developed at the University of Minnesota to assess the functional level of a boy with cerebral ALD. It includes an assessment of the boy’s need for services that is distinct from neurologic and neuropsychological evaluations. The levels range from 0 to IV with increasing disability
|Table 2: Adrenoleukodystrophy-Disability Rating Scale (ALD-DRS). Adapted from Peters et al. (2004).|
|0||No limitations or difficulties in learning or coordination due to ALD|
|I||Mild learning or coordination difficulties due to ALD; patient does not require support or intervention|
|II||Moderate learning or coordination difficulties due to ALD; patient requires support or intervention in some areas|
|III||Severe learning or coordination difficulties due to ALD; patient requires support or intervention in many areas|
|IV||Loss of cognitive abilities with disorientation due to ALD; patient requires constant supervision|
Assessments of neurologic function with identification of neurologic deficits (NDS, i.e., vision, hearing, speech, gait) were performed before and after HSCT and are presented in Table 3. To assign an NDS for a boy with cerebral ALD, the number of neurologic deficits is summed (e.g., a boy with vision and gait problems, but without hearing or speech deficits, would have an NDS of 2; he would receive one point each for vision and gait and no points for either hearing or speech). Assessments of ALD-DRS were also performed before and after HSCT (see Table 3). This table illustrates that with advanced stage cerebral ALD, i.e., increasing NDS and/or ALD-DRS there is less likelihood that the neurologic and functional status of the boy will be stabilized at the pre-HSCT level following HSCT. Approximately 60% of boys with an NDS of 0 or an ALD-DRS of 0 were able to remain at this level following successful transplant.
|Table 3: Neurologic deficit (NDS) and ALD-DRS scores before and after HSCT presented as percentage of patients who stabilized*. Adapted from Peters et al. (2004).|
|NDS||Total||Number of patients who stabilized after HSCT|
|ALD-DRS||Total||Number of patients who stabilized after HSCT|
* Stabilization is defined as maintaining the same NDS or ALD-DRS score or lower following HSCT when compared to the baseline/pre-HSCT score.
Results of neuropsychological function and ALD-DRS scores after HSCT according to baseline PIQ 80 are presented (Table 4). As baseline PIQ less than 80 has been previously noted to predict poorer outcomes after HSCT. The authors separated patients into 2 groups: baseline PIQ ≥80 and PIQ <80. Patients with a baseline PIQ less than 80 were significantly more impaired in both neuropsychological functions measured by PIQ and on the ALD-disability rating scale after HSCT.
|Table 4: Neuropsychological function (performance IQ, PIQ) and ALD-DRS after HSCT according to baseline PIQ. Adapted from Peters et al. (2004).|
|PIQ <80||PIQ ≥80|
|Median PIQ (range)||45 (45-63)||78.5 (45-122.5)|
|Median ALD-DRS (range)||IV (I-IV)||II (0-IV)|
Comparisons of neuropsychological function (verbal IQ, VIQ and PIQ) according to MRI pattern of demyelination (posterior vs frontal lobes or pyramidal tracts) are presented (Table 5). All survivors were compared with those who died on the basis of baseline neuropsychological testing. Although no difference was found in baseline median VIQ scores (survivors, 98 vs deceased patients, 92), the median baseline PIQ score was significantly lower in patients who died (survivors, 94.5 vs deceased patients, 77.5). Patients with a posterior pattern of demyelination demonstrated a greater mean loss of PIQ points (i.e., -21.6) than patients with a frontal pattern of demyelination (i.e., 0.4 PIQ points).
|Table 5: Neuropsychologic outcomes (verbal IQ, VIQ; performance IQ, PIQ) according to the pattern of demyelination on MRI. Adapted from Peters et al. (2004).|
|Posterior||Frontal/Pyramidal||Total||No data after HSCT due to death|
|Baseline||99||89||98||92 P= not significant|
|Baseline||96||92||94.5||77.5 P < 0.01|
|Change||-21.6||0.4||-16.8||P = 0.03|
The (Peters et al., 2004) report documents that the cumulative incidence of transplant-related mortality (TRM) at 3 years was 14%. In addition to providing related and unrelated donor HSCT Kaplan-Meier probabilities of survival, this report also described for the first time the excellent survival outcomes which could be achieved in boys transplanted for early stages of cerebral disease defined as 0 or 1 neurologic deficit and MRI severity score <9 (92% survival at 5 years vs. 45% for all others)
2007: Mahmood and colleagues analyzed the likelihood of survival in boys with cerebral ALD who had not received HSCT (Mahmood et al., 2007). In a subgroup of these patients with early cerebral disease, they compared survival in those who underwent HSCT with those who did not (Figure).
- Mean age at onset of symptoms in the entire 283 non-transplanted group was 7 years .
- 131 or 46% of patients died during the mean follow-up of 5.9 years at an average age of 12.3 years. 5-year survival was 66%.
- The 5-year survival probability of of the non-transplanted group group was significantly poorer than the 5-year survival of 95% in the transplanted group with early stage cerebral disease.
- Conclusions: HSCT in the early and progressive stages of childhood cerebral ALD is beneficial. The authors recommended that HSCT be offered to boys in the early stages of cerebral disease.
1997-2011: Numerous reports from single institutions describing their HSCT experience, the use of reduced intensity conditioning, and umbilical cord blood as a source of blood stem cells.
- Malm G et al. (1997) Treatment of ALD with bone marrow transplantation.
- Kapelushnik J et al. (1998) Matched unrelated human umbilical cord blood transplantation for ALD.
- Suzuki Y et al. (2000) Bone marrow transplantation for the treatment of ALD.
- Baumann M et al. (2003) Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in 12 patients with cerebral ALD.
- Resnick I et al. (2005) Treatment of childhood cerebral ALD by the use of an allogeneic stem cell transplantation with reduced intensity conditioning regimen.
- Ringdén O et al. (2006) Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for inherited disorders: experience in a single center.
- Beam D et al. (2007) Outcomes of unrelated umbilical cord blood transplantation for ALD.
2011: Miller and colleagues from the University of Minnesota recently published the largest single center HSCT experience for childhood cerebral ALD (Miller et al. 2011).
- HSCT experience from 2000 to 2009 for boys with cerebral ALD. Sixty boys received HSCT (median age at transplantation was 8.7 years) with varying conditioning regimens and blood stem cell sources.
- Following HSCT, 78% (n=47) were alive (median: 3.7 years, range 0.7 to 9.6 years). The cumulative incidence of transplantation related mortality at day +100 was 8%.
- The estimated probability of survival at 5 years was 75%.
- The estimated 5-year survival for boys with an MRI severity score <10 at HSCT was 89% and only 60% for boys with an MRI severity score ≥10.
- Progression of neurologic dysfunction after HSCT depended significantly upon the MRI severity score and the clinical neurologic status of the patient prior to HSCT.
2015: Van Geel and colleagues investigated if patients with adrenoleukodystrophy that underwent HSCT for cerebral ALD in childhood still develop the adult-onset spinal cord disease (myelopathy) in adulthood. This retrospective observational study found that three out of the five patients who underwent HSCT in childhood developed signs of myelopathy in adulthood. These data suggest that HSCT for cerebral ALD in childhood does not appear to prevent the onset of myelopathy and peripheral neuropathy in adulthood. These findings will have to be confirmed in independent studies. But if true, this will have consequences for follow-up of patients that were transplanted in childhood and are now becoming adults (Van Geel et al. 2015).
New directions and implications for the use of HSCT
An important issue with respect to the future of therapy for cerebral ALD and specifically HSCT is the challenge of treating boys with advanced stage disease. In order to more effectively treat boys with advanced stage cerebral disease (i.e., MRI severity score ≥9) prior to HSCT it is imperative to address the following issues: (1) develop a method to accurately assess cerebral disease velocity; (2) explore further the use of N-acetyl cysteine; (3) evaluate the use of reduced intensity HSCT conditioning regimens, (4) investigate combination therapies including alternative or complementary stem cells such as neural stem cells; (5) develop and implement more effective ways to rapidly halt the inflammatory demyelination, repair damaged myelin, and restore lost functionality.
The generally excellent to outstanding survival and functional outcomes observed after HSCT in boys with early stage cerebral disease (i.e., MRI severity score <9 and particularly ≤3) laid the foundation to implement newborn screening for adrenoleukodystrophy (see Newborn Screening). Furthermore, it would be highly beneficial and of extreme importance to identify marker(s) that predict which boys with adrenoleukodystrophy are destined to develop cerebral ALD and therefore will require HSCT.
It is important to note that currently there is no indication for use of HSCT in adult male or female patients with the spinal cord form, either with or without symptoms.
While significant advances have been made in reducing the risks associated with HSCT particularly those from unrelated donors of bone marrow or umbilical cord blood, there is still significant risk of transplant-related mortality as well as death due to disease progression. With the advances made in gene therapy (See the Gene Therapy for ALD page) an alternative to HSCT may be considered in selected cases (e.g., unavailability of a suitably matched donor of blood stem cells).
Disease-related lessons, which have been learned over the past 3 decades
- For advanced stage cerebral ALD, important elements include: (1) cerebral disease velocity; (2) anti-oxidant therapy, e.g., N-acetyl cysteine; (3) possible role for reduced intensity HSCT conditioning regimens, (4) possible combination therapies including alternative or complementary stem cells such as neural stem cells; (5) effective ways to rapidly halt inflammatory demyelination, repair damaged myelin, and restore lost functionality.
- For early stage cerebral ALD, important elements include: (1) newborn screening for adrenoleukodystrophy; (2) ability to identify marker(s) that predict which boys with adrenoleukodystrophy are destined to develop cerebral ALD.
- Long-term monitoring of survivors of HSCT for cerebral ALD to assess them for the development of spinal cord signs/symptoms.
- Currently, there is no indication for use of HSCT in men with spinal cord disease alone or for females with ALD either with or without symptoms.
Last modified | 2019-03-07